loader

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above
Close

Search

See all results for ""

Indian Government relaxes tax residency criteria for stranded individuals

09-May-2020

Introduction

Under Indian income tax law, an individual’s tax residency is determined by his physical stay in India during a Financial Year (FY) (i.e. 1 April to 31 March) as well as his stay in the preceding years. The residential status then determines whether his global income would be taxable in India or not.

There have been cases of Indians (primarily based outside India) who came into the country prior to the novel Corona Virus (Covid-19) outbreak to fulfil their social and financial obligations, and now because of the Covid-19 countrywide lockdown (imposed since 24 March 2020) have had to stay in India beyond the prescribed threshold number of days for FY 2019 – 20 (182 days or more).

Acknowledging this as a genuine hardship, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) via Circular No. 11 of 2020 dated 8 May 2020 (Circular), has decided to provide certain relaxations while counting the number of days’ stay by such persons in India, for the purpose of determining their tax residency status for FY 2019-20. A Press Release has also been issued in this regard which discusses the approach for the same concern regarding tax residency for current FY 2020-21.

Circular

For the purpose of determining tax residential status for FY 2019-20, the Circular provides relief to individuals who had come to India on a visit before 22 March 2020. The Circular has categorised such individuals into three broad categories and provided corresponding relief to them as under:

Categories

Relief provided

Category 1: Individual has been unable to leave India on or before 31 March 2020

Period of stay in India from 22 March 2020 to 31 March 2020 will be excluded for determining residential status

Category 2:  Individual has been quarantined in India due to Covid-19 on or after 1 March 2020 and

(i)  has departed on an evacuation flight on or before 31 March 2020; or

(ii)  has been unable to leave India on or before 31 March 2020

Period of stay in India from the beginning of his quarantine to the date of his departure or 31 March 2020, as the case may be (i.e. depending on (i) or (ii)), will be excluded for determining residential status

Category 3: Individual has departed on an evacuation flight on or before 31 March 2020

Period of stay in India from 22 March 2020 to date of departure will be excluded for determining residential status

Press Release

The Press Release states that as the lockdown continues during FY 2020-21 and it is not yet clear as to when would international flight operations resume, a circular excluding the period of stay of these individuals up to the date of normalisation of international flight operations for determination of the residential status for FY 2020-21, will be issued after flights resume.

Comments

Due to travel restrictions and quarantine requirements, several foreigners / NRIs have been stranded and forced to stay ‘involuntarily’ in India. Several representations were made to the Government (including by us at Khaitan & Co) to disregard the number of days spent by such individuals in India on account of such ‘involuntary stay’. Further, recently, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) had issued a guidance wherein it had suggested inter alia that respective governments should issue suitable relaxations to disregard the period of ‘involuntary stay’ for determining the tax residency of individuals. The Circular is timely and a welcome move by the Government as it has appreciated the genuine concerns of foreigners / NRIs with respect to their tax residential status.

However, it is important to note that the Circular deals only with the determination of tax residency of individuals; it does not deal with or provide for any relaxation with respect to similar issues that may arise in relation to  ‘Place of Effective Management’ test (a test under Indian income-tax law which deems certain foreign companies as Indian tax residents) or the ‘Permanent Establishment’ exposure for foreign entities on account of foreigners’ /NRIs physical presence in India.  One hopes that suitable clarification in this regard will also be issued soon so that foreign entities are not unnecessarily burdened with Indian income-tax trigger, reporting requirements and litigation. Further, as mentioned above, the number of days spent by a person in India in a FY is relevant not only for determining his / her tax residency status for that particular year, but also for subsequent financial years. In light of this, it would have been ideal had the Government also stated that the number of days of ‘involuntary stay’ in FY 2019-20 would be disregarded while determining the tax residency status of such individual for any subsequent financial year.

On a separate note, it is worth mentioning that even before the lockdown, the Finance Act 2020 had amended the test for determination of tax residential status of certain Indian citizens / PIOs from FY 2020-21 and made it more stringent by reducing the prescribed threshold number of days’ stay in a FY from 182 days to 120 days. Given that there is lot of uncertainty still persisting around Covid-19 lockdown and travel restrictions, it will be in the interest of all if the Government could defer this amendment  by at least a year so as to ease the burden in respect of FY 2020-21.

-       Sanjay Sanghvi (Partner), Raghav Bajaj (Principal Associate) and Jimmy Bhatt (Principal Associate)

For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com

Sanjay Sanghvi (partners)

We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.

Mumbai

One Forbes
3rd & 4th Floors, No. 1
Dr. V. B. Gandhi Marg
Fort, Mumbai 400 001

Chennai

119/65, First Floor
Dr Radhakrishnan Salai
Mylapore
Chennai 600 004,
India

Noida

Max Towers
7th & 8th Floors
Sector 16B, Noida
Gautam Buddh Nagar
201 301 India

Singapore

Ocean Financial Centre
#37-02 10 Collyer
37th Floor Quay
Raffles Place 049315,
Singapore