loader

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.khaitanco.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Khaitan & Co of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Khaitan & Co or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Khaitan & Co shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Khaitan & Co.

Please accept the above
Close

Search

See all results for ""

CCI concludes no contravention against bearings manufacturers

22-Oct-2021

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has passed a final order In Re: Cartelisation in the supply of Bearings (Automotive and Industrial) dated 21 October 2021, Suo Motu Case No. 7(02) of 2014. The investigation was conducted against NSK Ltd., Japan, NSK International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. and NSK Bearings India Pvt. Ltd. (NSK); JTEKT Corporation, Japan, and Koyo Bearings India Ltd. (JTEKT); and NTN Corporation, Japan (NTN).

Facts

The investigation was initiated pursuant to a leniency application filed by NSK based on which the CCI formed a prima facie view of contravention of the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act) and directed the Director General, CCI (DG) to submit an investigation report. During the course of the investigation, JTKET also filed a leniency application before the CCI.

The DG submitted its investigation report concluding contravention of the Competition Act by NSK, JTKET, and NTN with respect to certain Request for Informations (RFI) issued by a certain automotive OEM outside India, for the procurement of front wheel and rear wheel bearings, for its upcoming model.

The DG also submitted a supplementary investigation report based on the direction of the CCI and concluded contravention of the Competition Act by NSK, JTKET, and NTN with respect to RFQs for hub bearings issued by a certain automotive OEM, outside India.

Analysis by the CCI

The CCI observed that even though the DG investigated various bearings manufactures, it concluded a contravention of the Competition Act only against NSK, JTKET, and NTN and pertinently only on two instances.

For the first RFI in relation to front wheel and rear wheel bearings, the CCI observed that telephonic discussions between employees of NSK, JTKET, and NTN were clearly established with respect to the RFI. However, the CCI found that there was a contradiction between the cross-examination of the employees of NSK and JTKET.  Further, the documentary evidence submitted by NSK and JTKET (i.e., computer printouts) were not supported by a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Evidence Act). Therefore, the CCI could not place reliance on any such secondary evidence in the absence of such a certificate and settled principles of law. Since reliance could not be placed on secondary evidence, the only remaining evidence was the oral testimony of an individual, which would not be enough to establish coordination between NSK, JTKET, and NTN in Indian markets.

For the second RFQs for hub bearings, the CCI observed that the statement of the employees of NSK, JTKET, and NTN were not in sync with each other. Therefore, the material available was not enough to establish the fact that meetings took place or any discussions relating to price happened.  Further, the certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act was also not available and the date and time of such document could also not be established. Accordingly, no contravention of the Competition Act could be established based on these.

The CCI also observed that the leniency applicants did not provide sufficient details and material particulars in support of the averments made by them in their leniency applications.

Conclusion

The CCI concluded that the nature of evidence presented by the DG and the leniency applicants were insufficient and no case of contravention could be made out against the bearings manufacturers; and directed closing of the investigation.

All leniency applications may not necessarily lead to the imposition of pecuniary penalties upon defendants of such applicants. Since the order of the CCI was not passed in terms of Section 27 of the Competition Act, no right of appeal before the appellate tribunal is available to any party under the Competition Act.

Khaitan & Co successfully represented one of the bearings manufacturers before the CCI in the matter.

-     Manas Kumar Chaudhuri (Partner), Sagardeep Rathi (Partner), Pranjal Prateek (Partner), Aman Singh Baroka (Senior Associate)

For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com ​​​​​​​

Manas Kumar Chaudhuri (partners) , ()

We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.

For private circulation only

The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© 2024 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.

Mumbai

One World Centre
10th, 13th & 14th Floor, Tower 1C
841 Senapati Bapat Marg
Mumbai 400 013, India

Mumbai

One Forbes
3rd & 4th Floors, No. 1
Dr. V. B. Gandhi Marg
Fort, Mumbai 400 001

Delhi NCR (New Delhi)

Ashoka Estate
11th Floor, 1105 & 1106,
24 Barakhamba Road,
New Delhi 110 001, India

Kolkata

Emerald House
1B Old Post Office Street
Kolkata 700 001, India

Bengaluru

Embassy Quest
3rd Floor
45/1 Magrath Road
Bengaluru 560 025, India

Delhi NCR (Noida)

Max Towers,
7th & 8th Floors,
Sector 16B, Noida
Uttar Pradesh 201 301, India

Chennai

8th Floor,
Briley One No.30
Ethiraj Salai
Egmore
Chennai 600 008, India

Singapore

Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place, #34-02A
Singapore 048623

Pune

Raheja Woods
03-108-111, 3 Floor
8, Central Avenue, Kalyani Nagar
Pune - 411 006, India

Gurugram (Satellite Office)

Suite No. 660
Level 6, Wing B,
Two Horizon Center
Golf Course Road, DLF 5
Sector 43, Gurugram
Haryana 122 002, India

Ahmedabad

1506 - 1508, B-Blockr
Navratna Corporate Parkr
Iscon Ambli Road, Ahmedabadr
Gujarat - 380058