Monetary thresholds for filing of appeals by the income-tax department further enhanced
This is in furtherance to our Ergo Updates dated 23 July 2018 and 28 August 2018, on monetary limits for filing of appeal by the Income-tax department (Department). Now, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), vide circular No. 17/2019 dated 8 August 2019 (Circular), has further enhanced the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), High Court (HC) and the Supreme Court (SC).
The enhanced limits for each appellate forum are as under, i.e. the Department cannot file an appeal unless the ‘tax effect’ exceeds the following monetary thresholds.
|
APPELLATE AUTHORITY BEFORE WHICH THE DEPARTMENT WANTS TO FILE AN APPEAL |
OLD LIMITS FOR FILING AN APPEAL (INR) |
ENHANCED MONETARY THRESHOLD FOR FILING AN APPEAL (INR) |
|---|---|---|
|
ITAT |
2 Million |
5 Million |
|
HC |
5 Million |
10 Million |
|
SC |
10 Million |
20 Million |
With a view to provide parity in filing of appeals, the Circular further provides that where the tax dispute arises in multiple years in case of a taxpayer, the tax authorities should calculate tax effect year-wise and appeal should be filed only for those financial year(s) where the tax effect exceeds the above threshold. Also, in the case of a ‘composite order’ passed by High Court or appellate authority involving more than one financial year and containing common issues, no appeal should be filed by the Department for the financial year in which tax effect is less than the aforementioned monetary thresholds. Circular further clarifies that in case where a composite order / judgment has been passed involving more than one taxpayer, each taxpayer should be dealt with separately.
This is a welcome move which would help reduce unnecessary tax litigation which is a costly affair both in terms of valuable management time and financial resources. The monetary thresholds have been enhanced with a view to effectively reduce taxpayer grievances/litigation and help the Department to focus on litigation involving complex legal issues and high tax effect, thereby achieving its object of litigation management.
- Sanjay Sanghvi (Partner), Raghav Kumar Bajaj (Principal Associate) and Ujjval Gangwal (Associate)
For any queries please contact: editors@khaitanco.com
We have updated our Privacy Policy, which provides details of how we process your personal data and apply security measures. We will continue to communicate with you based on the information available with us. You may choose to unsubscribe from our communications at any time by clicking here.
For private circulation only
The contents of this email are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the professional views of Khaitan & Co and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. Khaitan & Co disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.
© 2021 Khaitan & Co. All rights reserved.
Mumbai
One Forbes
3rd & 4th Floors, No. 1
Dr. V. B. Gandhi Marg
Fort, Mumbai 400 001
Chennai
119/65, First Floor
Dr Radhakrishnan Salai
Mylapore
Chennai 600 004,
India
Noida
Max Towers
7th & 8th Floors
Sector 16B, Noida
Gautam Buddh Nagar
201 301 India
Singapore
Ocean Financial Centre
#37-02 10 Collyer
37th Floor Quay
Raffles Place 049315,
Singapore